Vae asks...

[sythyry]

The apology do I make now for not replying so well the last of my questions; each and every response that comes to me I shall give a reply today.

And -- what sort of monsters do you and your people suffer from?

Comments

[terrana.livejournal.com]

Consider the World Tree definition of monster. It literally refers to every nonprime species of animal. Given that (arguably) the only prime-analogue we have on Earth is human, I'm pretty sure every domestic animal and everything that humans ever competed with for resources during their multi-millennial history counts for this purpose.

Therefore, I would tend to argue the following: most are subdued, some farmed, a few kept as pets. Some sneaky little insects and arachnids still cause problems, but most are harmless.

[delight-in.livejournal.com]

Nooooo monsters aren't *all* animals. Monsters are dangerous creatures that aren't Primes. Some animals are domesticated or harmless like guntries or blossomaries those aren't monsters. Otherwise it'd be doorwaying to have a pet or sell livestock in the city and that'd be just silly.

[sythyry.livejournal.com]

The wonder is on me that some monsters here may be domesticated, though not so harmless.